A CFA Leave and
Live television advertisement aimed at residents of rural towns
to warn
them of the danger of 'staying' spells out in large letters
'TEMPERATURES CAN REACH 800 DEGREES DURING A BUSHFIRE'.
People are
taking this to mean the air temperature can reach 800 degrees in our town,
around our home, during a bushfire. And so there's nothing they can do but
Leave and Live.
This is NOT air temperature, not even near the fire front.
This is the
temperature inside a flame.
Deep within the core of fire front flames.
To
experience 800C during a bushfire,
you would have to walk into the fire front.
Temperatures
have been accurately taken within the flames of fire fronts burning in dry eucalypt
forests by an amazing system of fire proof thermometers set up by a research
group of eminent bushfire scientists.
They registered
a maximum of 1100C near the flame base,
and minimum 300C at the flame tip.
If it was true
that during a bushfire air temperature can reach 800 degrees where you are
during a bushfire, no one who stayed at Kinglake or Marysville during that
worst of worst bushfires, Black Saturday 2009, would have been left
alive. All those who 'sheltered' on the sports ground would been
cremated. No building would have remained.
What purpose is served by this
terrifying, distorted, advertisement?
The intensity of heat emitted from any flame front is
directly related to the density of vegetation in which it is burning. There is
even a formula for this: ‘the
intensity of a bushfire increases as the square of the dry fuel weight’ (I = W2).
No matter how fierce is the flame front burning in the bush,
it HAS TO immediately die down when it reaches a less dense area of vegetation.
Five metre flames burning in 2 metre high grass HAVE TO drop or stop when they
reach dirt, gravel, concrete, or 2 cm high grass.
Google: "Flame
temperature and residence time of fires in dry eucalypt forest", by B.
Mike Wotton, James S. Gould, W. Lachlan McCaw, N. Phillip Cheney and Stephen W.
Taylor 2011 (International
Journal of Wildland Fire 21(3) 270 – 281. Full text http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF10127